Sammie lee wilcox dating site
Sammie lee wilcox dating site - Free Online
She’d had her ovaries removed, the pathology results were back, and they could not have been much worse.Berg had stage III ovarian cancer, and her prognosis was poor.
Talc powder might be a cause ovarian cancer–who knew? Berg was stunned to learn that since the early 1980s, a slew of studies had found that women who regularly used talc powder for feminine hygiene had higher than average rates of ovarian cancer.Yet the evidence–which fell short of proving causation–was mostly confined to medical journals and had barely made a blip on the public radar.For millions of women, Berg included, dusting the genitals or underwear with powder was a daily ritual, like brushing teeth. ” So after painful rounds of chemotherapy, Berg filed a first-of-its-kind lawsuit against J&J in federal court in her home town of Sioux Falls, S. A mystifying verdict in October, 2013, enabled both sides to declare victory.Since her teens, Berg had used Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower, another Johnson & Johnson powder marketed to women. “Your body perspires in more places than just under your arms.” How could a product meant for babies be dangerous? The jury found Johnson & Johnson Consumer Cos., guilty of negligence for failing to warn of the risk of ovarian cancer, but awarded zero damages to Berg. Yet the case brought a slow-building controversy to a head.Plaintiff lawyers, heartened by a liability finding in arch-conservative South Dakota, have since brought claims for about 700 ovarian cancer victims or their survivors, blaming the disease on exposure to talc powder. Along with J&J, the suits name Imerys Talc America, Inc., part of the global mining concern that supplies talc to J&J. ” said plaintiff Deborah Giannecchini, 62, a Modesto, Calif., hospital secretary diagnosed with metastatic ovarian cancer in November 2012. “I sure would have appreciated being given the chance to say this is worth the risk or it isn’t.” In J&J, “we’re dealing with a company that has done nothing to inform customers of the risk and, in fact, I believe has taken steps to hide the risk from the public,” said Ted Meadows, a lawyer with the Montgomery, Ala., firm of Beasley, Allen, which is involved in many of the cases.It is the policy of Olmsted County to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data.
Information contained herein should not be relied upon for any type of legal action.
While the Olmsted County Sheriffs Office tries to use only accurate and current information, it cannot represent that the information is current, accurate or complete.
Deane Berg’s doctor called her in the day after Christmas, 2006, to give her the crushing news.
Other marketers of talc powder and the Personal Care Products Council, a Washington, D. trade group for cosmetics makers, are named in some of the cases. Imerys and the Personal Care Products Council wouldn’t comment, and J&J refused interview requests, but released a statement: “We have no higher responsibility than the health and safety of consumers who rely on our products.
This story also published by: Miami Herald The Kansas City Star Tampa Bay Times The Charlotte Observer The Raleigh News & Observer The Sacramento Bee The Fresno Bee Fort Worth Star-Telegram Mc Clatchy DC The Tacoma News Tribune The Wichita Eagle Idaho Statesman Industrial Safety & Hygiene News The Modesto Bee The San Luis Obispo Tribune Merced Sun-Star Lexington (Ky.) Herald-Leader Florida NJ Spotlight Bradenton (Fla.) Herald Columbus (Ga.) Ledger-Enquirer The Macon (Ga.) Telegraph Sun Herald (Biloxi-Gulfport, Miss.) Centre Daily Times (State College, Pa.) The Bellingham (Wash.) Herald The Olympian (Olympia, Wash.) Tri-City Herald (Kennewick, Wash.) Belleville (Ill.) News-Democrat Hilton Head Island Packet Lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson contend that women contracted ovarian cancer from using its talc powders for feminine hygiene. It is important for consumers to know that the safety of cosmetic talc is supported by decades of scientific evidence and independent peer-reviewed studies.” The companies contend that statistical associations between talc use and ovarian cancer are weak, and may result from bias in the study methods.
A causal link is not biologically plausible, they say, since there is no proof that talc particles can pass through the genital tract to the ovaries or that, once there, they could cause malignant growths.